天主教明言七宗罪：「饕餮」、「贪婪」、「懒惰」、「嫉妒」、「骄傲」、「愤怒」、「淫欲」。沙摩塞是承办凶杀案的资深员警，即将退休，而米尔斯是新手，一付兴致高昂，自愿请调至这一分局。星期一上午，一件凶杀案发生，凶手在冰箱后写着「饕餮」，星期二，是一位律师，现场写着「贪婪」，一天一个，依七宗罪而死。面对此案，沙摩塞心中有诸多挣札，住在这城市已久的他，早已习惯，冷眼看事情，本想不接此案，几经考虑又留下来帮米尔斯，米尔斯血气方刚，冲动易怒，故弄玄虚的凶手因而选上他做为七宗罪的最后一人－「愤怒」。强竟杀了米的妻子崔西来激怒他。让自己成为「嫉妒」，米尔斯成为「愤怒」，强也赢得了这场游戏。沙可以退休了，但看著囚车中的米尔斯，究竟是社会始终如此不堪，或者天真单纯也是一种罪。
　　这部出色的惊险悬疑影片对犯罪心理学也作了详尽的描述，而罪犯通过圣经的道德审判来杀人，更具社会意义。一个警察最后却成为凶手计划的执行者，这是对社会和人生的讽刺，是对茫茫之中天主那七大信条的不可抗拒，还是象征了这多罪该罚的人世间的混乱的生活秩序？正象影片结束时斯班瑟说的那句话“海明威说：这个世界如此美好，值得人们为它奋斗。我只同意后半句。”
　　在电影里，七罪、七罚、七次下雨、故事发生在七天，甚至结局也由罪犯定在第七天的下午七时，无处不在的“7”暗示观众：它是宿命的罪与罚。既然如此，宿命的悲剧是必定要属于人间的，“上帝”作为“授意者”和“观望者”，参与了整个事件。冷血杀手作为传道者莅临人间，最终以身殉道。从某种角度看，悲剧中没有正邪的区分，作为渺小的人类，只能接受宿命的审判。
　　然而《七宗罪》恰好利用观众对玄学的神秘感和不理解，剑出偏锋的讲一个连环谋杀的故事。 “Seven”在宗教上是个神秘的数字，这一点在旧约中有最充分的表现。上帝用七天造亚当，取出亚当的第七根肋骨造了夏娃。撒旦的原身是有七个头的火龙（《启示录》第十二章第三节写道:“有一条大红龙，七头，也戴着冠冕......
　　《七宗罪》向人们呈现了一个变态的宗教杀手。芬奇无意用血淋淋的感官刺激和大量的追逐场景来达到使人恐怖的效果。他并非对杀戮场面进行简单的电影图解，而意在揭示这种杀戮后后面的东西。这部电影塑了与以往电影中截然不同的一类杀手。《七宗罪》中的杀手杀人并非是因为嗜血，而是有着强大的理论信条加上妄念来实施他自以为的通过"审判"和布道来拯救的目的。这才是最可怕的。这个杀手也许平时连一只鸡也不杀，但是他找到了依据来实施对人的毛骨悚然的谋杀。这种恐怖并非是亲眼看到某种可怕场面时感官的自然反应，而是心理上的恐怖。这使得《七宗罪》这部看起来像是侦探片或类型化恐怖片的电影脱离了这些窠臼，而与美国社会现实生活建立起了心理上的联系。
　　一个不正常的社会是产生这样的杀手的根源。现实生活中美国持续不断发生的连环变态杀手事件也在电影中不断有所反映和体现。然而，现实中以完全相同的手段进行残害的杀手虽然还没有发现，但却有很多在精神气质和思想观念上和他十分接近的人，让我们想想世界各地近年来出现的邪教组织和连环杀手：太阳圣殿教、奥姆真理教、吉姆·琼斯、邮包连环杀手大卫·卡钦斯基……最终都是以悲剧收场。
　　《七宗罪》使人们接触的是最黑暗的人性的一面，尽管它是虚构的，可是它的气息已经进入了现实的思绪和情感之中。正像片中老侦探说:"如果我们抓住了John Doe (杀手)，而他本人就是魔鬼和撒旦的话，那也许是我们所期望的。但他不是魔鬼，他只是一个人……"有什么能比一个人做魔鬼的行径更为恐怖的吗？但更为恐怖的是，杀手的动机是以宗教为名义的。在杀手的彻底疯狂里似乎还有某种理智，这是最恐怖的事情。这部电影并非是关于杀戮，并非是关于一个人如何干出魔鬼般的行径的，而是关于那种杀戮的动机，以及这个动机的由来和它后面的东西。
　　剧情阴暗、主题悲观、手法低调的警匪片，却因为剧本结构的新奇、演员表现的优异以及导演别具一格的叙事风格而变成了一部叫好叫座之作。故事背景是一个整天下雨的不知名城市，摩根·弗里曼饰演一名即将退休的老刑警，而布拉德·皮特则是怀抱理想热情来这里上任的新人。他们碰到了一连串离奇的凶杀案，凶手故意在现场留下人类的七个罪诫“暴食、贪婪、懒惰、淫欲、骄傲、嫉妒和愤怒”，跟警方大玩心理战。一冷一热的警探组合终于逼到凶手投案自首，却无法改变既定的悲剧命运。导演戴维·芬彻在银幕上呈现出一个令人触目惊心的社会黑暗面，由凯文·史派西饰演的凶手在终场前发表了一段自辩之词，更具高度的反社会煽动力。
　　让观众希望他活着的人在结局死掉,这永远是让你的电影被人们记住的有效手段之一.于是,年轻警察米尔斯的妻子翠西死了.事实上导演并没有让我们看到翠西被凶手割下来的头,可是我们都明白,处于极度悲愤下的米尔斯开枪打死了凶手------这是一个智慧,坚忍,疯狂的罪犯.于是,罪犯完成了他的罪恶的艺术品.最后两种原罪------罪犯死于嫉妒,而米尔斯因为愤怒杀了罪犯,也背上了原罪,等待审判(来自人间...).
　　关于罪犯：
　　贪吃,淫荡,贪婪,懒惰,高傲,嫉妒,愤怒---------这就是七宗原罪.影片中的罪犯在前半段一直没有露面,但是他作案的手法确实已经让所有的人感到震惊.他可以强迫一个人吃到胃涨裂和内出血;他可以花一年的时间精心"养育"他的受害人;为了完美的犯罪过程,他把自己手指头的皮肤剥去,以免日后留下指纹.全部的过程都在在这个罪犯的掌握之下,一步一步,我们随着罪犯的带领下,欣赏这他引以为豪的犯罪过程.七种原罪在时间横行,我们已经见怪不怪.但是,其实这才是最大的恶魔,而我们的凶手只是这些罪恶的一个化身.每天都有人因为贪婪而死;因为嫉妒而死,因为愤怒而死......我们天才的导演大卫芬奇也许就是想告诉我们：在这个物欲横流的世界上,太多的人已经迷失了自己.就连那个身为警察的米尔斯,最后也因为爱妻被害而失去理智,开枪杀死了罪犯.事实上,这也是我们自身无法控制的,也是我们无法抵抗的,这个完美强大的罪犯,已经把这些寓意都展现给我们.看着他心平气和得到警察局里自首的时候,我就知道这一切,刚刚开始......
　　关于影片：
　　大卫芬奇无疑是一个天才,这样的一部电影拍在我们面前,除了为他鼓掌,为他流泪,真的没有什么别的可作.这个题材的成功和演员的到位我就不想多说了.值得注意的是它的每一个细节都是把握的那样完美.刚刚搬家过来,所以需要磨合,所以家里会体验到地铁的恐怖,所以凶手可以在家里找到他的妻子并杀害.我原以为拍电影很容易,现在才知道这和做饭一样,泡方便面也叫做饭,满汉全席也叫做饭,究竟你是什么样的厨师,看看你作的饭就知道了。
　　影片描述一个连环杀手和两个警探的故事。此君精通古典文学，他精心设计了一套向邪恶世界挑战的方法：根据西方古典文学的说法，人有七宗罪，分别是贪吃、懒惰、荒淫、愤怒、妒嫉等。他为每一宗罪找到一个代表人物，然后用以毒攻毒的方式置该人于死地。比如，他强迫一个贪吃的胖子不停地吃，直到撑死。

Although not originating from the bible, the concept of deadly sins is almost as old as Christian doctrine itself. Theologians like 4th century Greek monk Evagrius of Pontus first compiled catalogues of deadly offenses against the divine order, which 6th century pope Gregory the Great consolidated into a list of seven sins, which in turn formed the basis of the works of medieval/renaissance writers like St. Thomas Aquinas ("Summa Theologiae"), Geoffrey Chaucer ("Canterbury Tales"), Christopher Marlowe ("Dr. Faustus"), Edmund Spenser ("The Faerie Queene") and Dante Alighieri ("Commedia Divina"/"Purgatorio"). And in times when the ability to read was a privilege rather than a basic skill, the depiction of sin in paintings wasn't far behind; particularly resulting from the 16th century's reformulation of church doctrine, the works of artists like Hieronymus Bosch and Pieter Bruegel the Elder brought the horrific results of humankind's penchant to indulge in vice back into general consciousness with surrealistic eloquence, reminding their viewers that no sin goes unseen (Bosch, "The Seven Deadly Sins") and that its commission leads straight into a hell reigned by gruesome, grotesque demons and devils whose sole purpose is to torture those fallen into their hands (Bosch, "The Hay-Wagon" and "The Last Judgment;" Bruegel, "The Triumph of Death" and "The Tower of Babel").
More recently, the seven deadly sins have been the subject of Stephen Sondheim's play "Getting Away With Murder" and a ballet by George Balanchine ("Seven Deadly Sins"); and on the silver screen the topic has been addressed almost since the beginning of filmmaking (Cabiria [1914], Intolerance [1916]). Thus, "Se7en" builds on a solid tradition both in its own domain and in other art forms, topically as well as in its approach, denouncing society's apathy towards vice and crime. Yet - and although expressly referencing the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas, Chaucer and Dante - David Fincher's movie eschews well-trodden paths and grabs the viewer's attention from the beginning; and it does so not merely by the depiction of serial killer John Doe's (Kevin Spacey's) crimes, which could easily degenerate into a mindless bloodfest that would defeat the movie's purpose. (Not that there isn't a fair share of blood and gore on display; both visually and in the characters' dialogue regarding those details not actually shown; but Fincher uses the crimes' gruesome nature to create a sense of stark realism, rather than for shock value alone.) In addition, Doe's mindset is painstakingly presented by the opening credits' jumpy nature, his "lair"'s apocalyptic makeup and his notebooks, all of which were actually written out (at considerable expense), and whose compilation is shown underlying the credits. The movie's atmosphere of unrelenting doom is further underscored by a color scheme dominated by brown, gray and only subdued hues of other colors, and by the fact that almost every outdoors scene is set in rain. Moreover, although screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker explains on the DVD that the story was inspired by his observations in New York (and the movie was shot partly there, partly in L.A.), it is set in a faceless, nameless city, thus emphasizing that its concern isn't a specific location but society generally.
Central to the movie is the contrast between world-weary Detective Somerset (Morgan Freeman) who, while decrying the rampant occurrence of violence in society, for much of the movie seems to have resigned himself to his inability to do something meaningful about this (and therefore seems to accept apathy for himself, too, until his reluctant final turnaround), and younger Detective Mills (Brad Pitt), who fought for a reassignment to this particular location, perhaps naively expecting his contributions to actually make a difference; only to become a pawn in Doe's scheme instead and thus show that, given the right trigger, nobody is beyond temptation. As such, Somerset and Mills are not merely another incarnation of the well-known old-cop-young-cop pairing. Rather, their characters' development over the course of the film forces each viewer to examine his/her own stance towards vice.
Morgan Freeman and Brad Pitt perfectly portray the two detectives; while Freeman imbues his Will Somerset with a quiet dignity, professionalism and learning, muted by profound but not yet wholly irreversible resignation, Pitt's David Mills is a brash everyman from the suburbs with an undeniable streak of prejudice, a penchant for quick judgment and a thorough lack of sophistication, both personally and culturally. Notable are also the appearances of Gwyneth Paltrow (significantly Brad Pitt's real-life girlfriend at the time) as Mills's wife Tracy and ex-marine R. Lee Ermey as the police captain. Yet, from his very first appearance onwards, this is entirely Kevin Spacey's film. Reportedly, Brad Pitt especially fought hard for his casting; and it is indeed hard to imagine "Se7en" with anybody other than the guy who, that same year, also won an Oscar for portraying devilish Keyser Soze in "The Usual Suspects": No living actor has Spacey's ability to simultaneously express spine-chilling villainy, laconic indifference and limitless superiority with merely a few gestures and vocal inflections.
While "Se7en" can certainly claim the "sledgehammer" effect on its viewers sought by its fictional killer, the punishment meted out to Doe's victims - taking their perceived sins to the extreme - pales in comparison to that awaiting sinners according to medieval teachings. (Inter alia, gluttons would thus be forced to eat vermin, toads and snakes, greed-mongers put in cauldrons of boiling oil and those guilty of lust smothered in fire and brimstone.) Most serial killers have decidedly more mundane motivations than Doe. And after all, this is only a movie.
Seven is a very disturbing thriller about a serial killer,John Doe(Kevin Spacey), killing people via examples of the seven deadly sins - gluttony, greed, sloth, lust, pride, envy and wrath. The story begins with Detective Mills (Brad Pitt) being assigned to Detective Somerset (Morgan Freeman). Detective Somerset is due to retire at the end of the week, and Detective Mills is moving up in the world, and is to take Somerset's place. This is a very disturbing movie. It will keep you enthralled and glued to your seat for the entire 127 minutes. Indeed, I was staggered that I never once lost concentration or was bored with this movie.This is a movie with an unexpected ending that is absolutely unpredictable and which is not at all a "Hollywood" style ending.
I saw this movie a couple times, and I liked it as a scary movie on a rainy day or whatever.... it's just that, I know too many people who take this stuff seriously. It's filled with Christian or more specifically Catholic, mythology - the seven deadly "sins" Lust, Vanity, Gluttony, Pride, Wrath, Sloth and Greed. It's basically a vigilante who goes around killing people in horrific manners as a punishment for their "sins." It has a surprise ending which was cleverly thought out more or less, but innocents suffered at this guy's hands and the plot doesn't really make sense. In no way does it make moral sense. First of all, Catholics practice child sacrifice and torture and enslave women, which does not qualify them as the best moral judges. The bible in itself is tyrannical and abusive, as well as chock full of lunacy - not the reasoned judge I'd want making decisions on my moral life that's for sure.
Also this guy does not really mete out justice. A person guilty of gluttony, sloth or vanity, does not deserve death, not even in the Catholic church and they loooove to kill and torture people. Usually, you go to confession and say a Hail Mary or two. I think the psycho in this movie was just looking for an excuse to kill people and get his pic in the paper, or whatever, and con a bunch of suckers into thinking he was some underground hero instead of what he was - a cruel psychotic, not-very-bright, jerk. Actually I have a lot of compassion for people who mess up in life, controlling the worst of your nature is difficult, most people mess up often on all counts - and Catholics can be overly critical - not to mention psychotic - about details anyway. You really have to know a person's whole life to know what they are. Maybe that guy was injured and gained weight because he couldn't move around very well, maybe the guy having sex was lonely and frightened and needed physical contact... who knows? You can't judge people on an outward, shallow look-over of their lives. If you want to help people out with their struggles for virtue why not invite the gluttony guy out to walk with you, or ask the lustful guy what intimate relationships mean to him, or why he's lonely or out of control? Maybe they're looking for help, virtue is it's own reward and all that - and lack of it is it's own justice in many ways. I think the psycho killer could've stayed at home and worked on himself, it would've worked out on it's own.

七宗罪分别是傲慢、妒忌、暴怒、懒惰、贪婪、暴食及色欲。
剧情
天主教中有七种死罪，然而一场离奇的连环杀人案，受害者都是死于这七宗罪其中的一种。经验十足的警探Somerset经过不懈的努力，终于将这些看似没有联系的命案屡出头绪，五桩命案过后，凶手下一个目标是谁？在何处？没有人可以预见。正当警方不知所措之际，凶手奇迹般的自首了，此时凶手的“七宗罪”还差两宗，难道他会就此罢手？他又为何会自投罗网？凶手宣称自己的“伟大杰作”仍会完成，在警方的严密看管下，插翅难飞的杀人犯又能做什么呢？结局大大出乎人的意料。
天主教明言七宗罪：「饕餮」、「贪婪」、「懒惰」、「嫉妒」、「骄傲」、「愤怒」、「淫欲」。沙摩塞是承办凶杀案的资深员警，即将退休，而米尔斯是新手，一付兴致高昂，自愿请调至这一分局。星期一上午，一件凶杀案发生，凶手在冰箱后写着「饕餮」，星期二，是一位律师，现场写着「贪婪」，一天一个，依七宗罪而死。面对此案，沙摩塞心中有诸多挣札，住在这城市已久的他，早已习惯，冷眼看事情，本想不接此案，几经考虑又留下来帮米尔斯，米尔斯血气方刚，冲动易怒，故弄玄虚的凶手因而选上他做为七宗罪的最后一人－「愤怒」。强竟杀了米的妻子崔西来激怒他。让自己成为「嫉妒」，米尔斯成为「愤怒」，强也赢得了这场游戏。沙可以退休了，但看著囚车中的米尔斯，究竟是社会始终如此不堪，或者天真单纯也是一种罪。
幕后/花絮

经验丰富的老探员萨默塞特再过七天就要退休了，年轻的警察米尔斯是他最后一个搭档。凶案发生了，罪犯在现场分别留下了“贪婪”、“饕餮”等字样，这正是《圣经》中所讲的“七宗罪”。一切罪行都出自一个名叫多伊的男子之手，他将米尔斯诱至荒野，但米尔斯没想到在邮包中竟找到了自己爱妻的头颅，狂怒的他开枪射杀了多伊，并最终完成了“七重罪”凶杀。
“饕餮”、“贪婪”“懒惰”、“淫欲”、“骄傲”、“嫉妒”和“暴怒”这七项原罪贯穿了整个影片，但担任审判者的却是个为了不留下指纹连自己手指都砍了下来的变态杀人犯。开场镜头就是寒意凛冽的雨天，而此后那些触目惊心的犯罪现场更是让人感到一种虚无的恐惧。
这部出色的惊险悬疑影片对犯罪心理学也作了详尽的描述，而罪犯通过圣经的道德审判来杀人，更具社会意义。一个警察最后却成为凶手计划的执行者，这是对社会和人生的讽刺，是对茫茫之中天主那七大信条的不可抗拒，还是象征了这多罪该罚的人世间的混乱的生活秩序？正象影片结束时斯班瑟说的那句话“海明威说：这个世界如此美好，值得人们为它奋斗。我只同意后半句。”
在电影里，七罪、七罚、七次下雨、故事发生在七天，甚至结局也由罪犯定在第七天的下午七时，无处不在的“7”暗示观众：它是宿命的罪与罚。既然如此，宿命的悲剧是必定要属于人间的，“上帝”作为“授意者”和“观望者”，参与了整个事件。冷血杀手作为传道者莅临人间，最终以身殉道。从某种角度看，悲剧中没有正邪的区分，作为渺小的人类，只能接受宿命的审判。
然而《七宗罪》恰好利用观众对玄学的神秘感和不理解，剑出偏锋的讲一个连环谋杀的故事。 “Seven”在宗教上是个神秘的数字，这一点在旧约中有最充分的表现。上帝用七天造亚当，取出亚当的第七根肋骨造了夏娃。撒旦的原身是有七个头的火龙（《启示录》第十二章第三节写道:“有一条大红龙，七头，也戴着冠冕......
《七宗罪》向人们呈现了一个变态的宗教杀手。芬奇无意用血淋淋的感官刺激和大量的追逐场景来达到使人恐怖的效果。他并非对杀戮场面进行简单的电影图解，而意在揭示这种杀戮后后面的东西。这部电影塑了与以往电影中截然不同的一类杀手。《七宗罪》中的杀手杀人并非是因为嗜血，而是有着强大的理论信条加上妄念来实施他自以为的通过"审判"和布道来拯救的目的。这才是最可怕的。这个杀手也许平时连一只鸡也不杀，但是他找到了依据来实施对人的毛骨悚然的谋杀。这种恐怖并非是亲眼看到某种可怕场面时感官的自然反应，而是心理上的恐怖。这使得《七宗罪》这部看起来像是侦探片或类型化恐怖片的电影脱离了这些窠臼，而与美国社会现实生活建立起了心理上的联系。
一个不正常的社会是产生这样的杀手的根源。现实生活中美国持续不断发生的连环变态杀手事件也在电影中不断有所反映和体现。然而，现实中以完全相同的手段进行残害的杀手虽然还没有发现，但却有很多在精神气质和思想观念上和他十分接近的人，让我们想想世界各地近年来出现的邪教组织和连环杀手：太阳圣殿教、奥姆真理教、吉姆·琼斯、邮包连环杀手大卫·卡钦斯基……最终都是以悲剧收场。
《七宗罪》使人们接触的是最黑暗的人性的一面，尽管它是虚构的，可是它的气息已经进入了现实的思绪和情感之中。正像片中老侦探说:"如果我们抓住了John Doe (杀手)，而他本人就是魔鬼和撒旦的话，那也许是我们所期望的。但他不是魔鬼，他只是一个人……"有什么能比一个人做魔鬼的行径更为恐怖的吗？但更为恐怖的是，杀手的动机是以宗教为名义的。在杀手的彻底疯狂里似乎还有某种理智，这是最恐怖的事情。这部电影并非是关于杀戮，并非是关于一个人如何干出魔鬼般的行径的，而是关于那种杀戮的动机，以及这个动机的由来和它后面的东西。
剧情阴暗、主题悲观、手法低调的警匪片，却因为剧本结构的新奇、演员表现的优异以及导演别具一格的叙事风格而变成了一部叫好叫座之作。故事背景是一个整天下雨的不知名城市，摩根·弗里曼饰演一名即将退休的老刑警，而布拉德·皮特则是怀抱理想热情来这里上任的新人。他们碰到了一连串离奇的凶杀案，凶手故意在现场留下人类的七个罪诫“暴食、贪婪、懒惰、淫欲、骄傲、嫉妒和愤怒”，跟警方大玩心理战。一冷一热的警探组合终于逼到凶手投案自首，却无法改变既定的悲剧命运。导演戴维·芬彻在银幕上呈现出一个令人触目惊心的社会黑暗面，由凯文·史派西饰演的凶手在终场前发表了一段自辩之词，更具高度的反社会煽动力。
让观众希望他活着的人在结局死掉,这永远是让你的电影被人们记住的有效手段之一.于是,年轻警察米尔斯的妻子翠西死了.事实上导演并没有让我们看到翠西被凶手割下来的头,可是我们都明白,处于极度悲愤下的米尔斯开枪打死了凶手------这是一个智慧,坚忍,疯狂的罪犯.于是,罪犯完成了他的罪恶的艺术品.最后两种原罪------罪犯死于嫉妒,而米尔斯因为愤怒杀了罪犯,也背上了原罪,等待审判(来自人间...).
关于罪犯：
贪吃,淫荡,贪婪,懒惰,高傲,嫉妒,愤怒---------这就是七宗原罪.影片中的罪犯在前半段一直没有露面,但是他作案的手法确实已经让所有的人感到震惊.他可以强迫一个人吃到胃涨裂和内出血;他可以花一年的时间精心"养育"他的受害人;为了完美的犯罪过程,他把自己手指头的皮肤剥去,以免日后留下指纹.全部的过程都在在这个罪犯的掌握之下,一步一步,我们随着罪犯的带领下,欣赏这他引以为豪的犯罪过程.七种原罪在时间横行,我们已经见怪不怪.但是,其实这才是最大的恶魔,而我们的凶手只是这些罪恶的一个化身.每天都有人因为贪婪而死;因为嫉妒而死,因为愤怒而死......我们天才的导演大卫芬奇也许就是想告诉我们：在这个物欲横流的世界上,太多的人已经迷失了自己.就连那个身为警察的米尔斯,最后也因为爱妻被害而失去理智,开枪杀死了罪犯.事实上,这也是我们自身无法控制的,也是我们无法抵抗的,这个完美强大的罪犯,已经把这些寓意都展现给我们.看着他心平气和得到警察局里自首的时候,我就知道这一切,刚刚开始......
两个警察：
这是两个典型的警察形象：年轻的警察血气方刚,冲动易怒,老警察沉着稳重,机智耐心,而且孜孜以求,心地善良.他们之间从抵触,到理解,再到互相关爱,属于一条温馨的线索.年轻的布拉德皮特就像一个冲动小野兽一样,他自尊自信,不容许别人怀疑他.他有着美好的愿望,于是他和他的美丽妻子来到了这个危险的地区.老警察摩根弗里曼是一个经验老到的长者,他关爱年轻人就像自己的孩子.我很高兴的看着这两个人一起研究案情的样子,更像是父亲带着儿子一起走向成功的终点.他们本身的正义感驱使他们发挥出所有的能力,于是他们可以在第一次合作就这样默契.人与人之间的感情,越是在这种关键的时刻,越是可以完美的发挥出来.
关于演员：
我不知道为什么大卫芬奇会选择凯文斯潘塞扮演罪犯的角色,但是我知道这个决定真的是太明智了.凯文的表演充分展现了这个杀手的一切：冷静,睿智,彬彬有礼,偏执......当他微笑着对布拉德皮特说："你们一直在找我......"我觉得我看到了上帝.他是那样的胜券在握,来自首明显是出于自愿,以至于每个人都知道最精彩的肯定是这之后.在审讯室里他还是那样的坦然自若,装着红茶的小口袋被他拿在手里玩来玩去.然后,最精彩的就是他在汽车里的那段对话了.他平静的看着远方,令人震惊的理论就这样坦然的说了出来.
和他相比之下,其它两位男演员的表演也毫不逊色,性感迷人的布拉德皮特扮演的年轻警察一定会让所有的女观众着迷,血气方刚的脸上是抹不去的希望.一局"Iamalloverready"带着讽刺的语气说出来,于是这个人物的特征就这样可在你的记忆里再也挥之不去.相比之下,摩根弗里满的沉默让人充分体会到金子的感觉,而他偶尔说出的一句话,或者睿智,或者威严,或者幽默,已经深刻的体会到了这个角色的内在要求.
关于影片：
大卫芬奇无疑是一个天才,这样的一部电影拍在我们面前,除了为他鼓掌,为他流泪,真的没有什么别的可作.这个题材的成功和演员的到位我就不想多说了.值得注意的是它的每一个细节都是把握的那样完美.刚刚搬家过来,所以需要磨合,所以家里会体验到地铁的恐怖,所以凶手可以在家里找到他的妻子并杀害.我原以为拍电影很容易,现在才知道这和做饭一样,泡方便面也叫做饭,满汉全席也叫做饭,究竟你是什么样的厨师,看看你作的饭就知道了。
影片描述一个连环杀手和两个警探的故事。此君精通古典文学，他精心设计了一套向邪恶世界挑战的方法：根据西方古典文学的说法，人有七宗罪，分别是贪吃、懒惰、荒淫、愤怒、妒嫉等。他为每一宗罪找到一个代表人物，然后用以毒攻毒的方式置该人于死地。比如，他强迫一个贪吃的胖子不停地吃，直到撑死。