As is known to all, Hamlet is regarded as the most spectacular crown Shakespearean plays a diamond, it is the pride of Shakespeare. He lives by "will be of value to the destruction of human to reveal the deep soul and the prospect of mankind and think. The book is endless to silence, silence of the search direction. It will allow just doing the whole rules rules of 1,000 Hamlet "one". According to the development and change of heart, Hamlet in the play can be divided into four stages: the first stage, vuitton university: the prince Hamlet is full of the ruling class society, in his youth, prince vuitton university, full of humanistic ideals. His enthusiasm, love, friendship, love, loyal to their parents, have good fantasies that can achieve ideal. He felt the world is harmonious, richly. "The earth" is "a good framework", "sky" is "a good house", "top layer of the gold inlaid fire ideas", "human is the roof of the universe, the essence of long". "Human is a masterpiece of how wonderful! How noble reason! What a great power! How elegant appearance! How civilized behavior on behavior! How like an angel! In wisdom as a god! How is the essence of the cosmos!!!!!!!!!!" the soul of things long.
I filia, "maria described his courtiers eyes, scholars, the tongue of the soldiers, countries in a charming flowers; forward when the flow of ethics, fan, remarkable center". Claudius and said, "he is careless of mass delight", "the general public to his great affection". The second stage, the father mother married and died because of aspiring regicide uncle who prince Hamlet heart: the ideal - father suddenly die, but not a month his beloved mother and marry her husband's brother, claudius. Significant changes, Hamlet to love, friendship, and ideal start, he began to doubt "bubble", "one woman," suspected society and life. These he created the "who". The cruel reality, let Hamlet feel "earth this a good framework" into "to the vast sea of a desolate mountain cape", "the sky this tabernacle", "top good this layer with golden fire", "the idea of roof is just a lot of" together "jealousy. People, just a bit of clay. "To be or not to be? This is the question." "who died because of their oppressors, and mocked abuse, arrogantly, bear the reproach of pain, court brokenhearted, the government, do the drudgery of high-handed manner, let little genius apparent pride a kick out..." The third stage, "play" before the prince Hamlet to confusion: find out what ghosts and a situation similar drama gong zack's death ", added a few lines, to make daily performance testing claudius, crimes were confirmed. "Want to know! Originally is one of the devas rule, now what is the throne sits? A big - peacock." This sentence is the key to understand all the action of Hamlet. Claudius crimes only exists in the society of the evil one. Hamlet's father enmity and pushed by the tide of reforming, puts forward a great mission. This reflects its ability and broad mind and the height of the social responsibility. Is an entirely to challenge the impossible dream, a kind of any individual cannot achieve the dream. He fell and the contradiction between the social existence, don't say no action, even thought way is slim. The fourth stage, the court before the sword, "if the prince hekun walls" letter of Britain to borrow wang hand DiaoBao Hamlet, killing Hamlet return journey of planning and Denmark, and thus successfully treat death attitude to grave digger prince of god and god has deepened the superstition. The harsh reality that he must be thinking in claudius. The sword of the king of old, rape and add new crimes crimes, the prince take decisive action, oneself also destroyed. He finished the task for the father, but no vengeance is impossible to accomplish the mission of reforming course. Reading this book, feel very depressed, don't know why Hamlet is unpredictable. A "era, horrible, dislocation BanZheng make it come naturally" grandiloquence immediately replaced "to be or not to be, that is a question worth considering this desperate sigh. Actually, Hamlet is a slight awkwardness in understanding and the soul shoulder not commensurate with the ability to act. Use of Goethe: "this is a tree to plant on a should only be open tender flower vase." Hamlet, a pure, noble, moral, intellectual, and have the determination and only to replace behavior, may not be hero, is the "vase", That he cannot afford, almost to all have no, but not shirk responsibility, is that the revenge. "" oak plants
Once the oak roots ", "vase" inflation is not to break, this is a tragedy. Hamlet, people in the vulnerability and the environment is so cruel to other opposite but this unique personality, appear in the connotation and extension of dense, also appear in broad and researched. It was said that some experts, Hamlet and not an objective outdated, but the role of each person. "To be or not to be, that is a question," because just happened in Hamlet of these things sparked him for life philosophy thinking, in all his life, he is ShunNi won't consider this question, then he saw the bright side of life, is that life is beautiful, and now, the sudden tragedy forced him to face life dark side and an ugly side of human nature. Can say, Hamlet to life in the dark side still have a better understanding. He is blind to it all. Now the cruel reality, forcing him to face it. He a presentiment that he had been inevitable into a tragic fate. If his father's death was the father, for revenge his life became an unshirkable mission. And he is the king of the enemy, want to kill him, affirmation is not an easy thing, but no matter how difficult it is, the death of his father, and he must report the current task is to come up with a clever way to check whether his uncle killed his father. Plot, plot against and slaughter, these are against the nature of Hamlet kind pure, but also the mission of his revenge. In the life of the mood of Hamlet carry on a heavy heart, all revenge mission hatred, make his heart, he and heavy overcast into the abyss of pain. For death "do all that concerns into a coward, determination of red sheen, by careful thinking cap on a layer of gray, great undertakings in this regard, also currants turne away. Lost action." Hamlet in matters of life and death of doubt in his future is foreshadowed in revenge, pass a hesitant to easily revenge. It's only because in revenge pray, that he might kill him into heaven, it would be too expensive. This is a description of the DuanXinLi activity to show him the fundamental questions unanswered life philosophical thinking, this problem for each has profound implications. Calm down and in fact, he is probably the one Hamlet in the side of a person, the change process of Hamlet is not everyone experiences are? The everyone is unable to avoid. When in childhood, youth, no real society into all the time is full of joy in the eyes of the prince, everything is fine, everything is so fresh and curiosity, then there are too many dreams and think for yourself, let the dream to cope with all too late and how might have time to sad and oneself have nothing to do so? When the children to grow up slowly began to become the salad, meet with some minor things, so in this time is more sensitive to the heart, however still retains the childlike innocence of childhood, have good for something still, when things better result of the dream of the ideal, or, when will become very sullen even pessimism, then the children of all around are so ugly and hate, let children feel a society, the world is particularly brutal, think oneself too innocent to escape from reality. When the experienced some cruel things or, to do any time to think, recites thinks right action, but just worry too much, miss again, sometimes the chance to miss the opportunity to themselves instead will also find excuses to get rid of the inner disappointment and empty, more will be to prove to everybody own helpless and innocence. The consideration in half-baked or recklessly helpless action after failing to their own will still find all kinds of excuses so as to improve their appearance, but are ever think to do so in the end only instead is self-defeating. Experience is a kind of wealth, then let students learn moment caress your mind, slowly, in later years, in the teaching, slowly towards the earth belongs to his own expectations, and closer to the dream.

莎士比亚是位伟大的作家，在他的作品中悲喜剧皆有，可以说他的戏剧包含着十分深刻的含义。正如文艺复兴时期其他杰出的作家、艺术家一样，他的创作中充满了对人性的关怀，如诗人一样满怀激情的对白、如哲人一样深邃的思想，莎士比亚的四大悲剧正是其中的代表。
悲剧具有其独特的魅力，古希腊时代的剧作家，如索福克勒斯、埃斯库罗斯都是以悲剧扬名希腊。一部不朽的《俄底甫斯王》被后人研究了几千年也不能穷尽其中的奥妙，哲学、心理学、宗教学、文学都从这部剧作中得到了启发。莎士比亚的悲剧又是一个不可逾越的高峰，他完全可以和古希腊多产的作家相媲美。这些作品就像甘泉一样不可干涸，总能让我们思考生命乃至宇宙的意义。
我认为悲剧应该具备以下四个元素，无论是哪出悲剧，或多或少都可以找到这四种基本的元素。第一，理想和现实的冲突。第二，人性的缺点所造成的不可避免的悲剧。第三，对所谓命运的无可奈何。第四，悲剧人物理想人格的彻底破灭，通常以悲剧人物的死亡而告终。
《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亚最具感染力的悲剧之一。读过后觉得其中悲剧产生的主要根源就在于理想和现实的强烈冲突。
哈姆雷特王子是个浪漫的理想主义者。在外求学多年，他坚信自己理想中的世界，人都应该是正直的、光明磊落的，回国后却发现自己的至亲却与自己理想中的人格相去甚远，父亲去世不到两个月母亲就嫁给了叔父，而自己的叔父在得到王位并与自己的嫂子结婚后却处之泰然。当哈姆雷特得知父亲真正的死因，这种冲突变的更加强烈，可以想象哈姆雷特所在的大学校园是很纯洁的地方，可是当他回到自己的国家他无可避免地卷入了一场宫廷阴谋中，他必须为死去的父亲复仇。如果是老道的政治家那他一定会不露声色地、有计划地夺回自己的王位，当自己的仇人死后他才会长出一口气，并向天下昭示仇人的罪行，自己也绝对能被马基亚维利当作经典案例来分析。哈姆雷特的做法却不是这样，因为他是一个人文主义者，注定他的爱情甚至是复仇都是一种理想化的，剧中没有过多描写他和莪菲利亚的爱情。哈姆雷特的悲剧就是一个极端理想主义者跌入了一个极端现实的世界，其实人类最大的悲剧莫过于此。哈姆雷特一面赞颂着人类是“宇宙的精华，万物的灵长！”一面感叹“要做到高贵，究竟该忍气吞声容受命运狂暴的矢石交攻，还是挺身反抗无边的苦恼，扫他个干净。”有人认为哈姆雷特的性格过于软弱，他的状态似乎飘忽不定，其实可以理解，现实和理想冲突人总是会彷徨一阵的。
《奥塞罗》中明显的悲剧元素就是奥塞罗性格的缺陷，只要是人总会有些嫉妒心的。这出戏好像也摆脱了希腊悲剧的模式，人性的弱点成为悲剧的根源。这出戏中的悲剧并不是奥塞罗的性格作祟，也不能归罪于那个蛇蝎心肠的恶汗亚果（我甚至有点喜欢这个敢于剖析自己心理的阴谋家），在戏剧的刚开始我们就能感受到奥塞罗和玳丝德摩娜的爱情注定是个悲剧。玳丝德摩娜并不了解奥塞罗，她喜欢奥塞罗的理由很简单，她喜欢他讲述那些颇具传奇性的经历，一句话她只喜欢一个浪漫的理想。当亚果的妻子告诫玳丝德摩娜当心奥塞罗的妒忌的时候，她却说“我想他在出生地让阳光把这种气质（妒忌）都吸去了。”而奥塞罗有点明白自己的妻子为什么喜欢自己，或者说他对自己妻子的爱本来就不放心，在这种情况下他对玳丝德摩娜又爱又恨又怕。最终，亚果只是起了一个导火索的作用，将这种虚假的、毫无信任的、不牢固的爱情炸个粉碎，而真正具有爆炸力的火药却在奥塞罗和玳丝德摩娜的身上。由此看来这出悲剧倒有些主人公咎由自取的味道，可是谁又能真正改变自己的性格呢？
《里亚王》的悲剧似乎在我们的生活中绝少见到，毕竟我们认为亲情是最温暖的也是最牢固的。可是我们要注意戏剧的背景一个充满谋求权力和财富的宫廷政治斗争，政治可以让一切变的肮脏，对触手可及的权力和财富的谋求可以让人变成魔鬼。西方有这样一个故事是讨论人性的，有一个善良的牧羊人，他绝对是一个正直的人，可是有一天他得到了一枚戒指，戴上它之后可以隐身。于是这个牧羊人可以做一些他以前不能做的事情，终于有一天他进入了王宫，勾引了王后并密谋杀死了国王，从此他和以前的自己判若两人，成了一个十足的暴君。我们可以想象如果他没有得到那枚充满魔力的戒指，他一定还是一位善良的人。叔本华说过，人每时每刻都是有作恶的想法的，这其实是有一定道理的，关键是人有时候没有作恶的能力而已。里亚王的悲剧的根源也许就在这里。日本导演黑泽明的力作《乱》就是根据《里亚王》改编的，故事的背景是日本的战国时代，这让我们感觉更加真实了，如果是太平盛世，毫无权力的寻常百姓中怎么可能发生这样的事呢？其实我们翻一翻历史就会发现这样为权力而父子、兄弟相残的事情简直太多了。里亚王的悲剧就在于人性的沦落，莎士比亚在这部作品中也时刻反思着人性的本质。《里亚王》的结局是悲惨的，但是注意，我们只要稍稍改变一下结局，那么悲剧就能够马上变成喜剧。如果最后，里亚王的小女儿考黛丽亚活着，里亚王也没有死，那么这就是个皆大欢喜的结局，悲剧就能够成为喜剧。法国剧作家莫里哀的喜剧《伪君子》同样也可以很简单的转变成悲剧。结局可以这样设计，伪君子答尔丢夫很顺利的霸占了奥尔恭的财产，他的女儿玛丽亚娜也不得已嫁给答尔丢夫，玛丽亚娜的情人瓦赖尔刺杀答尔丢夫未遂而入狱，奥尔恭的妻子郁郁而逝，奥尔恭沦为乞丐。
《麦克白斯》颇似古希腊悲剧，其中很强调命运对人嘲弄。麦克白斯原本功成名就，可是他却相信三女巫的预言，最终预言一一应验，但是麦克白斯也身败名裂。这让我想起索福克勒斯的《俄底甫斯王》以及埃斯库罗斯的《阿伽门农王》，人的举动都受到神的干涉，当然其中也体现着主人公性格的缺陷。可是《俄底甫斯王》中几乎没有表现出俄底甫斯王的人格或者是性格带来必然的毁灭，可以说俄底甫斯是一个生性善良的人，当必然的命运来袭却无力逃避。也许悲剧的悲就体现在人的无辜和无助上，悲剧的美表现为主人公的抗争上，虽然看起来是徒劳的。
可以看到悲剧中必然会出现痛苦和死亡，人们喜欢悲剧正是由于每个人都是悲剧的主角，因为同悲剧一样，人的一生也要以死亡作为结局而谢幕。但是悲剧并不是悲观，我们的结局是不可避免的，但是在短暂的悲剧中却表达了一种不妥协的永恒的精神。因此，明知理想遥不可及我们还是执著追求，明知人无完人但还是要不断完善自我，明知命运无常可是一点也不畏惧，死亡是生命的终结，但不是生命存在的目标。

砌上一杯茶,点上一根烟..夜已经很深了，再过几分钟,12点就过去了,,,房间静悄悄,惟有墙上挂着的钟滴答作响,. 望着窗外,思绪仿佛回到以前,,,以前的61是怎么过的啊? 小的时候的六一节最开心的是有那么一两年，爸妈工作都不忙的时候带我去游乐场玩.. 最倒霉的六一节是读幼稚园的时候,老师给小朋友分蛋糕,我贪吃,抢了人家的蛋糕吃,结果,那天下午,闹肚子,晚上都吃不了我妈妈给我准备的大餐,,,痛苦的咽着口水......(这段成了我妈教育我妹妹经典教材)... 最幸福的是六一节的时候当上小队长,不过,两礼拜后,因为我好说话，上课管不住自己,让老师咔嚓给没了...... 最难忘的六一节是那天下了雨(我们那经常下雨),我们班漂亮的小MM带了雨伞,我是出门从不带伞的....于是,凭着我超凡的魅力.说服了她和我一起回家..后来被不知哪个八卦的混蛋说到班上，结果，我的难忘成了过去，一去不复返了．．．. 最大喜大悲的六一节是借到我们班一高才女生的作业那个喜悦啊．．，她的作业都是提前写好而且都是小红花（六一节年级越高越痛苦，往往作业一大堆）．．．我付出的代价是１个月内管住自己，因为我们组要评优秀组，评到可是当中队长的有利政绩（巨反感那些把污浊带到学校的老师，让我们幼小天真的心灵蒙上一层阴影）．．后来的结果是，我和一群小伙伴玩，那天还下雨，（好象从读三四年级开始，我们就有了男女之别的概念，反正我那时是最不屑与女生一起玩的，借作业是例外）我们玩疯了，身上全是汗水和雨水，我的书包也不例外．．．回家被老妈暴Ｋ一顿不说，我的作业也抄不着了，全花了．．．．．回到学校．．那种痛苦啊．．于是，她变成了我的克星，一直到小学毕业，因为这个，她中队长没了，（不过我想起来最纳闷的事，她要是把这事告诉老师，我顶多挨顿罚，她不就没事了吗？真傻，也许告诉老师，她的后果更严重吧）　．．　到了初中．高中，就没有６１了．那是小孩才过的节日，直到读大学，莫明其秒．好象读到大学人都读傻了，居然开始怀念６１了．．．那也是最甜蜜的６１，我还记得那天晚上，和那时的女朋友，她叫我陪她过６１，那时一顿紧张，（每个月的花消都投她身上了，要有节日，那可是最最可怕的事情，居然六一也算．．．．什么破节日啊）不过那天还好，没出去暴晒，接受阳光和钱包的双重洗礼．．她只是在傍晚的时候叫我买冰激灵（这才多大的事啊）去操场，还记得，我们沿着跑道走了一圈，冰麒麟也吃玩了，她偷偷的在我脸上亲了一下．．突然间我就象中了江湖上传说的茴香酥骨散，，整个人都麻掉了．．．不记得是怎么回的寝室，反正，那天哥们都说我犯什么神经，叫我喝酒都不去，一个人在宿舍傻乐．．．　后来的６１就没什么特别了，都是考试／升学／就业／一天到尾都是烦着．．．　思绪回到现在，烟灰缸已经拉下好几个烟头，回想起今天下午所里的老同事还说，小林啊，下班回家怎么过６１啊？我一顿愕然的笑．．．另一女同事说，以后想过就没啦．（她是个４岁小孩的妈妈）．．．愕然．．．为什么？我也不知道．．．只知道自己度过了一个孤独的节日．．．　好想和一个人，先过儿童节．再过青年节，然后过情人节，再过母亲节，再过父亲节，然后过重阳节．．．．．

Shakspere (wrong spelling) created Hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage .In order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father, he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery. On the contrary, we can also say that Hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge . if (Capitalize "If" since it is the beginning word of the sentence.) a country has no king, how can a country keep alive (You need a question mark here since it is a question.) So, every thing has two sides, the bright side and adumbral side. Every time we make a decision we have to think twice.
Comment:
Be careful with your spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Too many uncessary mistakes.
It is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of Hamlet. Thats quite objective and convincing .
Hamlet " of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable, spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said: " you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental slaughter, borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result." Windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany, is attends his father's funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father's funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony, this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course, launched the life and death contest with Claudius. Finally, sent out sword the revenge to Claudius
Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.