12月里，我读了英国作家乔纳森;斯威夫特的《格列佛游记》，小说以辛辣的讽刺与幽默、离奇的想象与夸张，描述了酷爱航海冒险的格列佛，四度周游世界，经历了大大小小惊险而有趣的奇遇。
游记中小人国、大人国里光怪离奇的故事深深地吸引了我，然而给我印象最深的是，1710年格列佛泛舟北美，巧访了荒岛上的慧因国，结识了具有仁慈、诚实和友谊美德的慧因。在慧因国的语言中没有“撒谎”和“欺骗”这样的字眼，人们更不理解它的含义。他们不懂什么叫“怀疑”、什么是“不信任”，在他们的国度里一切都是真实的、透明的。
格列佛在慧因国里度过了一段美好的时光，他完全融入这个社会，以致于与暗喻人类的耶胡交往时形成强烈的反差，因为他们总是以怀疑的眼光看待他的诚实，使他感到失落，对人类产生了极度的厌恶。 我很羡慕文中的主人公有幸能到慧因国，慧因国是我们所追求和向往的理想境地，在这里你不需顾虑别人说话的真假，而在现实的世界，有着太多我们不愿看到的事情常常发生：有人用花言巧语骗取别人的血汗钱、有人拐卖儿童谋取暴利、有人甚至为了金钱抛弃自己的亲身父母。难怪我们的老师、长辈从小就教育我们要提高警惕，不要上当受骗。这与我们提倡的帮助他人、爱护他人是很难统一的。当我遇到有困难的人，要伸出援助之手时，我迟疑；当有人替我解围时，我不敢接受。这些都让我内心感到痛苦、矛盾，无所适从。既妨碍了我去“爱”别人，同时也错过了别人的“爱”，在难道不是一种悲哀吗？
我不知道十八世纪美国的辉格、托利两党缠绵悱恻、暧昧的关系，当然也就无从体会斯威夫特笔下的争论吃鸡蛋应先敲哪头、 鞋跟之高低等"原则"问题的"高跟党"与"低跟党"的妙处。
我错怪斯威夫特了，我要有一颗宽容的心。而后来的斯威夫特也渐渐变得可以理解了，给我的感觉是他很正义。
他讽刺地道出了当时英国的特点："贪婪、党争、伪善、无信、残暴、愤怒、疯狂、怨恨、嫉妒、淫欲、阴险和野心。"他挖苦地描述了人兽颠倒的怪诞现象：马成了理性的载体，而人则化作脏臭、屎尿横飞、贪婪刁难的下等动物耶胡。他大谈人的天性，就是心甘情愿被金钱所奴役，不是奢侈浪费就是贪得无厌。看完《格列佛游记》之后，我们不能不审视自己，我们身上有没有这些顽疾劣根的影子。
有一句话，我认为评论得很经典：以夸张渲染时代的生气，藉荒唐痛斥时代的弊端；在厌恨和悲观背后，应是一种苦涩的忧世情怀。
没有想到在那些朴实得如同流水账的大白话游记中竟蕴含着这么深邃的内涵。
我期盼着有一天我们的社会也像慧因国，孩子们的眼中不再有疑虑，教育与现实是统一的。我愿为此付出努力，也希望大家与我一道，从自己做起，从现在开始做起，让这个社会多一点真诚、少一点虚伪。
In December, I read the British writer Jonathan; Swift's "Gulliver's Travels", the novel spicy Satires and Humors, quirky imagination and exaggeration, describes the passion for sailing adventure Gulliver, four degrees travel around the world, has experienced large and small, thrilling and interesting adventure. Travels small one country, a country with Guangguai adult bizarre story fascinated me, however, impressed me most is that in 1710 Gulliver rafting in North America, Qiao-hui's visit to the uninhabited island on from country to country, met with kindness, honesty and friendship of the United States and Germany-hui because of. The language of the Hui from country to country there is no "lying" and "deceit" This kind of words, people are more do not understand its meaning. They do not understand what is meant by "suspect" and what is a "no confidence" in their country where everything is real, and transparent. Gulliver in the Hui from country to country spent some good time, he fully integrate into the community, so in Yehuda and the metaphor of humanity when dealing in sharp contrast, because they are always viewed with suspicion by his honesty made him feel lost, to the humans with revulsion. I am very envious of the text of the protagonist had the honor to go to Hui from country to country, Hui from country to country is what we pursue and the ideal situation, where you need not worry about anyone else speak the truth or falsity, but in the real world, there are too many we do not want to see what often happens: Some people use rhetoric cheat someone else's hard-earned money, some trafficking of children to reap huge profits, some even to abandon their own personal money to the parents. No wonder our teachers, elders childhood education, we must be vigilant and not cheated. We advocate with the help of others, care for others is very difficult to unity. When I met people who have difficulties, we must lend a helping hand, I hesitated; when someone to set me free, I was afraid. All these make my heart feel the pain, contradictions, and know what to do. Not only impeded me to "love" other people, but also missed out other people's "love" in it not a sad thing do? I do not know the United States, the eighteenth century Whig, Tory parties romance, intimate relationships, of course, there can be no experience of Swift's novels of the controversy to eat eggs which should first knock on the head of the high and low heels and other "principles" the problem "high-heeled party" and "low-heeled party" beauty. I Cuoguai Swift, I have a tolerant heart. Later, Swift has gradually become understandable, and gave me the feeling that he was righteous. He ironically tells the characteristics of the then English: "greed, the party struggles, hypocrisy, no letters, brutal, angry, crazy, resentment, jealousy, lust, sinister and ambitions." He sarcastically describes the reversal of the bizarre phenomenon of human-animal: horse become a rational vector, while the others into a dirty, smelly, urine dashing, greed, under extremely difficult and animals, such as Yehuda. He discusses the human nature, that is willing to be enslaved by money, not extravagance and waste that is insatiable. After reading "Gulliver's Travels", we must look at ourselves, our bodies have no such illness, Liegen's shadow. There is a saying, I think that comment very classic: the exaggerated rendering times angry, absurd denounced by the drawbacks of the times; in hate and pessimism behind should be a bitter feelings of Anxiety. Did not expect that in those plain as if running account is simply a big Journey contains the vernacular so profound connotations. I look forward to the day when our society, like Hui from country to country, the children's eyes are no longer in doubt, education and the reality is unified. I would like to do this effort, I hope you join me, starting with ourselves, from starting now, so that this society a little more sincere and less hypocritical.

Long vacation, I read the British writer Jonathan • swift's "Gulliver's Travels." Spicy Irony and Humor novel, bizarre imagination and exaggeration, to describe very fond of nautical adventure Gulliver, everywhere around the world, has experienced large and small, thrilling and interesting adventure.
Travels in Brobdingnag, the bizarre story of Lilliput deeply attracted me, but to me the deepest impression in 1710 Gulliver rafting in North America, a chance encounter on a desert island Hui from country to country, met with kindness, honesty and virtue King Hui of the story from country to country. Hui from country to country in the language did not "lie" and "deceit" in such words, people do not understand their meaning. They did not know what is "suspect", what is the "no confidence." In their country, the all are real and transparent.
I am very envious of Gulliver hopes to have the luck to Hui from country to country, where it is we seek and yearn for the ideal situation, where you do not need to worry about other people to speak true. But in reality, it was with sweet words to cheat other people's hard-earned money; was trafficking in children from making excessive profits; it was even money in order to abandon their birth parents ... ... No wonder, our teachers, elders from childhood on education we have to remain vigilant, carefully taken deceived.
I also look forward to the day when our society can be like the Hui from country to country, as the children's eyes no longer have doubts about, education and the reality is unified. I would like for this effort, I hope you will join, from what I start, start from the side so that the society a little more sincere and less hypocritical