"Don Quixote" in the novel the hero formerly known as Jiao Alun Suojihada is a township-kun, he read the then popular novel knights of society into the fan, and he is trying to imitate knight go Ranger. From his well-known antiquities in, find a pair of run-down incomplete armor, Don Quixote Delamanqia own name, but also identified a servant Sancho, and a neighboring village milking girl, named Du Erxiniya, as the service of a loved one whom his life. Then ride a skinny horse, away from home. Don Quixote is also, according to his mind the idea of the eccentric act to windmill as a giant, the sheep as the enemy, the victims of slave labor as a knight, a giant head as a wine bag, regardless of indiscriminate, hack chaos kill, sudden, many ridiculous things, his actions not only with people useless, and he is suffering a beating. After his last home bedridden, dying only understand the situation. He intestate, the only heir niece, such as married Knight, on the abolition of their right to inheritance.
At first glance, "Don Quixote", I think it's just a ridiculous vulgarity of making, ownership neurotic "brave spirit" of the performance of most vividly in the book, people increasingly despised him. But a careful look, and felt that the book implies a kind of truth. The nature of people's most basic goal is to own desperate to make it happen. In the realization of the process, who super-skinny like a root-like sorghum bachelor knight-errant, who Strange Alliance Pina gentleman, always reflecting his integrity, good nature, it is humanity's most noble spirit, because it is too simple, and only sudden, a number of jokes.
Miguel de Cervantes wrote "Don Quixote", the for the hit satire fabrications, the circumstances are bizarre people in the Knights of the novel and its adverse impact. Had intended to write a few short stories, was written was written, his own life experiences and ideals have written into their ideological content becomes richer and more realistic characters, until the Spanish society to the people portrayed disasters brought into Spain at that time that we understand and study the social, political, economic, cultural and customs of an encyclopedia. Miguel de Cervantes in "Don Quixote" in one hand and commented on the problems and expose and criticize the social evils on the one hand praised getting rid of punishing evil and promoting good, helping the poor and weak economic virtues, extolling the gold century style social ideals and goals . All these are common human feelings, it can pass through time and space, for every age, every nation has a sense of reality. Separated by four centuries later, is still moving forward to every reader. "Don Quixote" and appeared in nearly 700 personal objects, describe a very broad picture of life, true and comprehensive reflection of the late 16th century to the early 17th century Spain, the feudal social reality and expose the decline of the Kingdom of Spain is moving toward a variety of conflict, condemning the aristocratic class, shameless, weal and woe of the people expressed their deep sympathy. I thought: It is for this reason that prompted this work by the world in 54 countries and regions, 100 authors selected to become the best classic literature classics

　　What can anyone say about Don Quixote that hasn"t been said? The book"s been around for four hundred years, has inspired virtually every literary movement from the eighteenth-century picaresque to the most obscure works of twenty-first century postmodernism.

　　Don Quixote is one of the few books that merits casual references with the definite article （The Quixote）， and additionally is one of the few books to spawn a universally-recognized adjective （quixotic）。 How to even approach a book like Don Quixote, a book that has been, at some time or other, all things to all people? How to evaluate a cultural monolith? The simplest way, of course, is just to pay attention to the fact that Don Quixote, four hundred years after its initial publication, is still a hell of a read!

　　Sure, there are rough patches, yet: the mini-novels that interrupt the narrative of the first part for a hundred-odd pages would have been easy targets for some modern publisher"s blue pencil, the long essays on arms or piety can ring strangely to reader sensibilities, the descriptions are sometimes a vague mess, and yet the basic story, the basic concept holds up.

　　It"s hard to stay mad at Don Quixote: as frustrating as the plot can be at times, some archetypal lure lurks within the world of Cervantes"s Spain, some magic that draws us in, much like the world of chivalry that continues to draw Quixote himself through the progressively more painful wringer of situations.

　　The concept of the novel is simple: Alonso Quijano, landowner from La Mancha, is obsessed with his library of chivalrous books. Driven mad by the inconsistencies of plot, character and philosophy that fill each volume of these seventeenth-century precursors to the fantasy novel, Quijano resolves to restore dignity to the lost profession of knight-errantry, assembles a rudimentary sword, suit of armor, and horse （the eternally-suffering-and-spavined Rocinante）， and sets out into Spain in his quest for glory.

　　In return for this act of hysterical faith, he finds violent innkeepers, malevolent thieves, cynical shepherds, sadistic nobility, and even （due to Avellaneda"s false sequel to the book"s first volume, one of the most famous pieces of fan-fiction ever written） an inferior （and, in the novel, invisible） Quixote impostor.

　　The first few scenes involve Quixote alone against the contemporary world, but before a hundred pages have elapsed Cervantes introduces Sancho Panza, Quixote"s gullible, bloated and homily-spouting squire, who in conjunction with Quixote provides the spark for endlessly bizarre discussions in which Quixote"s heightened, insane conception of the world is brought crashing to earth by Sancho"s sly pragmatism （discussions which occasionally end with Quixote threatening to pummel Sancho in order to shut him up

　　Once joined together, it"s very difficult to imagine Don Quixote and Sancho ever being split apart: the two are the original comic duo, locked into perpetually and mutually exclusive views of the world, and in and of themselves--whether Sancho is being asked to give himself hundreds of lashes in order to disenchant Quixote"s swineherd love interest, Dulcinea, or whether Quixote is mixing a potion based on olive oil and bitter herbs that will, in theory, cure all of Sancho"s Quixote-caused earthly wounds--the Knight and the Squire personifies the thematic conflict that propels the work.

　　In general, this is why Don Quixote remains one hell of a read--even today. The reader faces, in the same moment, an ideal view of the world （the world as enchanted, antiquated, idyllic） and the brutal facts of the actual world （the world as material, modern, loath to believe in knights.）

　　Quixote hacks at the belly of ogres in an inn basement, and is rewarded by a jet of wine in his face and a hefty bill for damages. He tries to rid the land of giants, and is spun, lance-first, by a powerful windmill he spears in the attempt. He attempts to liberate a statue of the Virgin Mary, which he believes to be a damsel in distress, from her captors, and in return is beaten up by priests.

　　Throughout, Sancho is there to say exactly what the reader is likely thinking--those aren"t giants; Dulcinea isn"t beautiful; none of this can be real--only to be rewarded with a lecture from Don Quixote about how he is beset by enchanters, who frustrate his every move by replacing the facts of his world, at the last moment, with devil"s illusions that bear an uncomfortable resemblance to our own reality. It"s a single joke repeated across a thousand pages, and yet it"s b enough to bring a laugh every time.

　　Quixote"s insistence on his own madness in the face of innumerable arguments to the contrary, many of which take the form of cat scratches, cracked bones and missing teeth, makes him an interesting character because we know--or we think we know--that Quixote is just wrong. Yet, despite all of the pain he suffers in pursuit of that wrong, he continues to believe that he"s right. So we read on page-after-page, waiting to see how much more the man who believes himself a knight is able to take before he gives in--whether, in the end, Quixote will give in at all.

　　We read not only for page-after-page, but for year-after-year, century-after-century, pulled by the cognitive dissonance that surrounds the knight like his own cloud of malicious enchanters. In the process, just as Quixote builds his castles from inns and criminal campfires, so we build castles of speculation from what we find in Cervantes"s Spain, at once so brutally real and so dream-like, the realm of archetype and myth founded on dreary life. We, like Don Quixote, are driven to hallucinate by what might be, in the end, just a very good story.

　　With Don Quixote, Cervantes has accomplished an enduring act of literary alchemy: just as Quixote is combined with Sancho, so is fantasy combined with reality, the eternal with the everyday, and like the combination of matter and anti-matter, the explosion of aesthetic power is, in magnitude, infinite, propelling readers from the earth--at first facing inward at what was left behind on the page, then, forgetting the earth, outward into meaning--farther and farther toward the dream-like stars.

　　细细品味一本名著后，相信大家都积累了属于自己的读书感悟，为此需要认真地写一写读后感了。可能你现在毫无头绪吧，下面是我帮大家整理的堂吉诃德读后感（精选10篇），欢迎大家分享。

　　堂吉诃德读后感1

　　《堂吉坷德》这部小说讲述了一个叫堂吉坷德的瘦弱绅士，迷恋上了骑士小说，竟异想天开地要外出历险。他找来邻村一位又矮又胖的农民桑丘作为自己的侍从，又把一位从未见过面的农村姑娘相像成贵族，当成自己的意中人看待。他骑着“罗西纳特”，手持长矛，穿着盔甲，前后三次外出历险，把风车当巨人，把羊群当作军队，到处“行侠仗义”，做了很多能让人哈哈大笑的事情，自己也吃尽了苦头。他的朋友们想出了很多办法来让堂吉坷德回家，最后他被化装成骑士的朋友打败，只好被迫放弃行侠游历。回家不久他就病倒了，临死前，他终于醒悟到自己迷恋骑士小说是错误的。

　　我觉得这本书吧，人物描写的很生动，不但表现出农民桑丘的胆小，而且也表现了在危险时很聪明，更衬托出脱离实际、幻想回到骑士年代的堂吉坷德式人物的可敬可悲。

　　这本书我最喜欢的人物是桑丘，他一开始让我觉得这个人不聪明，可到最后时，桑丘成为了海岛总督时，通过自己的智慧，当众人之面解决了三四件案子，让我懂得了是一个人通过自己的勤奋努力，通过自身的发愤图强，就会走向成功，会让金子发亮。

　　等我读到堂吉坷德醒悟到自己迷恋骑士小说是错误的时，我想自己在现实生活中还迷恋网络游戏也是不对的，我决定以后少玩游戏，多看看课外书。

　　通过对《堂吉坷德》的阅读之后，我觉得我要更加努力奋斗！

　　堂吉诃德读后感2

　　堂吉诃德幻想自己能够得到小说中火剑骑士用过的剑，可见，他已经将幻想与现实融为一体，将两者之间的界限擦掉了。并且，他将幻想世界中的一切搬到现实中来，将现实世界的事物抹杀掉。

　　堂吉诃德游侠的目的在于改造社会，清除人世间的不平。作者表达了自己对西班牙社会的黑暗的不满和拯救社会的个人愿望。堂吉诃德虽然博学多识，但他的即兴想象和发挥，并不是简单得胡言乱语，必定要求具备丰富的知识和基本的文学素养，才能对许多事情顺利地进行描述。

　　总结：每当堂吉诃德“发疯”的时候，桑丘总是会尽责地阻止他。但是，堂吉诃德对桑丘的警告总是置若罔闻，从而导致他的最终受害。本章对堂吉诃德与桑丘对话的详细描述，以及对堂吉诃德种种行为的描写，向我们展示了一个丰富饱满的骑士形象。从堂吉诃德的言谈举止中，我们可以看出他是一个性格复杂而矛盾的人物。一方面，他沉于幻想，一切从主观出发，行为荒唐、鲁莽，不会吸取教训。如将羊群看成军队，并且对桑丘的劝阻置之不理。另一方面，他的所作所为的出发点，却有高尚的一面，即为了奉行一种崇高的原则，他要做一个行侠仗义的骑士。他要锄强扶弱，伸张正义，并为此而奋不顾身。主观上，堂吉诃德是追求和维护真理，只是他所追求的是脱离实际、早已过时的“骑士道”。所以，他在现实中注定只能碰壁，最终害人害己。

　　因为全书章节太多，不再一一分析，特此总结报考。

　　堂吉诃德读后感3

　　这周，我读完了《堂吉诃德》这本书，书中有很多让人哭笑不得的事情。

　　《堂吉诃德》的主人公本名叫阿隆索。吉哈那，因为要当骑士，就给自己取名叫堂吉诃德。他有一个侍从叫桑丘。

　　刚开始读一二章的时候，我觉得堂吉诃德一点也不像骑士，倒像一个滑稽的疯子，竟然和风车搏斗。他的侍从桑丘也很笨。随着阅读的深入，我渐渐发现，堂吉诃德一些可笑的行为同时也表现了他的勇敢和善良。

　　有一天，堂吉诃德和桑丘来到了黑山，上山的路上，他们发现一个装有金币和衬衫的盒子，他们决定找到失主，将失物归还。后来他们又遇到了一头死骡和鞍辔，他们再次为鞍辔寻找失主。我们应该学习这种拾金不昧的精神，哪怕再普通的东西也要归还失主。

　　堂吉诃德临终前才醒悟：自己一生都太盲目，没有找到正确的奋斗目标。在生活中也有很多这样的事情。比如，有些家长想让孩子去国外读书，他们的孩子成绩优异，且对所去学校做了充分了解，最后学有所成。也有一些家长只为让孩子出国而出国，对目标学校并不了解，只为跟风，见别人去自己也要去，至于学到了什么就不得而知了。

　　我今后首先要树立正确的人生目标，就小学而言，我要努力学好各门功课，考上重点初中。同时我也要学习堂吉诃德拾金不昧、勇往直前的精神，不能受到一点挫折就放弃。我要做一个心怀梦想，脚踏实地，为目标坚持不懈的小学生。

　　堂吉诃德读后感4

　　塞万提斯笔下的《堂吉诃德》一经问世，便受到世人的热爱与追捧，这和它所反映的时代背景有很大的联系，仔细分析这部作品中的几位主人公，对我们的人生也有一定意义上的启示。

　　主人公阿隆索·基哈诺，也就是曼恰的堂吉诃德，在追寻自己梦想的途中，有幸运，亦有困苦，有欢笑，亦不乏悲伤，在茫茫人海中，任凭罗西南多的信步，任凭骑士道的艰辛，任凭“杜尔西内娅”带给他视觉上的冲击，也未曾诋毁他年轻时的梦想。有人觉得他滑稽，可笑，他的故事荒诞离奇，对，这点我承认，但我认为若是从片面来分析他的人生，是对原著的一种亵渎，也并非作者所想。

　　作者塑造的堂吉诃德在我眼中是一位勇敢的骑士，虽然他不被世人理解，虽然他常被世人劝解，但却始终坚持自己的梦想，从未破灭，虽然他在临死前恍然大悟，但他拥有的精神着实令我钦佩。当然，在剧情需要的情况下，他还是恍然大悟了，否则，他若死在一年后征战的途中会更贴切他的性格，也更显得顺理成章。

　　末尾有一段细节描写“外甥女照常吃饭，女管家依然喝酒，桑丘情绪也还行，因为继承的财产多多少少减轻了继承者对死者的怀念，垂死者的悲伤。”作者从堂吉诃德死后不久，别人的姿态中反映出了世俗的人情冷淡，以及金钱与感情可以相互抵消的内涵，我想，塞万提斯是想告诉我们生命的可贵，使得我们更加珍惜自己。

　　堂吉诃德读后感5

　　理想与现实总归是有差异的，就像《堂吉诃德》这本书的主人公——堂吉诃德，正因为他分不清理想与现实，从而引发了一大堆囧事。

　　本书的主人公堂吉诃德迷上了骑士小说，整天幻想着自己是诱地一位除暴安良，受人尊敬的大骑士。有一天，他找来了自己祖父曾经穿过的一副已经烂得不能再烂的铠甲，又找来了几块已经生锈的铁块披在自己的一匹马驹身上，认为这是陪同他一起征战沙场的战马，他还威逼利诱地找了一位仆人，还将隔壁村当一位姑娘当做自己的意中人，开始了一场糊里糊涂的大冒险，在这些年里，他还几次险些丢掉性命，最后，她被一位同乡找来的书生扮演的白月骑士所打败，返乡回家。刚没多久，就生了一场大病，梦见了自己的经历，回头一想，实在是十分荒唐可笑。

　　读了这本书，我最大的收获就是明白了如何面对理想与现实的差异。在我们有了一个伟大的理想时，我们要先看一下我们有没有实现这个理想的能力，如果有，我们还要看一下周围的环境容不容得下自己实现理想；如果没有，我们要通过努力来让自己可以实现自己的理想。当然，如果你的理想是不好的，我还是劝你不要为此努力。同时，如果你的`理想是对个人有利对社会有利对国家有利的，那么你一定要努力，不然这一切都只是空话，毫无意义。另外，在现实中，如果你在那边瞎做事，你就会像堂吉诃德一样。

　　《堂吉诃德》这本书，既幽默又有哲理，真是一部让我爱不释手的好书，很值得一看。

　　堂吉诃德读后感6

　　这个暑假，我读了塞万提斯的《堂吉诃德》，这本书给我讲了很多道理，也让我看见了十六世纪的西班牙的贵族直指反动腐朽的封建贵族和天主教会，下面我就带大家看看这本书。

　　这本书讲的是：堂吉诃德看骑士小说看迷了，决定像骑士一样，用打抱不平的方法来改造社会，最后拿着武器、穿着盔甲，带着一个叫桑丘的农民，出门冒险。

　　这本书的影响力太大了，以至于这部书出版后没有一个人在看骑士小说，如果人们看见了一匹瘦马，就会说：“这不是堂吉诃德的马吗？”这本书反映了当时的骑士制度，所以天主教会就特别狠塞万提斯，在《堂吉诃德》第一部发表后，塞万提斯并没有写第二部，而是从事了诗歌文学的创作，这时候，有人伪造了《堂吉诃德》第二部，这第二部和第一部完全不一样，竟然站在教会和封建贵族的立场上，把堂吉诃德写成了一个疯子，把桑丘写成了一个傻子，歪曲了整本书的事实。这让六十七岁、并患有水肿病的塞万提斯非常生气，他加快了创作，以表示对伪造者的抗议，只用了一年，《堂吉诃德》第二部就完成了。

　　这本书揭露了西班牙封建贵族的假面具，塞万提斯特别憎恨封建贵族和教会，不幸的是他在一六一六年逝世于马德里，人们在他的墓前造了堂吉诃德和桑丘的雕像，以示纪念。

　　堂吉诃德读后感7

　　去年寒假，我听了妈妈的介绍，看了一本叫《堂吉诃德》的名著，这本书是西班牙作家塞万提斯写的，文章写得非常非常风趣幽默，读完后令人不由得佩服塞万提斯丰富的想象力和他的杰出才华。

　　翻开书刚刚看了一点，我就不由自主地笑了。堂吉诃德原来是位乡绅，过着自在的生活，可他对骑士小说很着迷，甚至卖地买书，还有一间专门放骑士小说的屋子。由于他看得多了，就异想天开地把自己当作了一位游侠骑士，从而干出了一件件“惊天动地”的荒唐事。

　　读到这里，我觉得他放着舒适的生活不过，偏偏去过危险的游侠生活，实在是一个荒唐的人，但是，我又体会到他是一个非常有正义感的不达目的不罢休的人。堂吉诃德不分青红皂白，乱砍乱杀，闹出许多荒唐可笑的事情，他的行动不但与人无益，自己也挨打受苦，面对人们的嘲弄，他依然抬起高贵的头。他坚信自己是一个勇敢的骑士，同时，他也是一个正直、善良的人。

　　总的来说，《堂吉诃德》这部小说，揭露批判了社会的丑恶现象，也赞扬了除暴安良、惩恶扬善、扶贫济弱等优良品德。它可以穿越时空，对每个时代，每个民族，都具有现实感。所以，相隔四个世纪之后，这本书仍感动着每一个读者。我被伟大的作家塞万提斯深厚的文字功底，风趣幽默的语言而深深佩服！以后，我还要多读课外书、多观察思考、多写多练，争取做下一个“塞万提斯”。

　　堂吉诃德读后感8

　　不晓得大家是不是知道塞万提斯，对，他就是《堂吉诃德》一书的作者。《堂吉诃德》讲了一位深受骑士小说毒害的"骑士"冒险的经历，他身骑瘦马，披挂盔甲，手执长矛，横冲直撞，妄想成为国王，把风车当成巨人，把羊群当成军队，还把传教士当成魔鬼，成为人们的笑柄。

　　据说，作者写书的主要目的是讽刺当时的骑士小说，骑士小说的内容往往千篇一律：一位骑士为了赢得心上人的芳心，冒着生命危险外出，旅途之中，骑士除强扶弱、战巨人、斗恶龙、最终获得无穷的荣誉。塞万提斯也故意模仿这种写法，写出了一本骑士小说，那就是《堂吉诃德》。这本书内容涉及西班牙社会的多个层面，上至公爵，下至平民，所以我很喜欢。

　　在这本书中，我知道了，做事一定要考虑时期、条件、情况，不能盲目做事。暑假作业本中就有类似的一个故事，就是这个同样的道理，可见头脑清楚，不盲目做事有多么重要，如果犯这种错误，小则受到批评，大则影响国际，堂吉诃德则把整个国家闹得天翻地覆。同学们这下可知道盲目做事，不依靠证据做事的后果了吧！那可是很严重的哦！千万不要犯这样的错误哦！明白了吗？

　　同学们，我希望大家都头脑清醒，不盲目做事，千万不要变成"堂吉诃德"第2号哦！

　　堂吉诃德读后感9

　　寒假里，一本塞万提斯的《堂吉诃德》出现在我的眼帘里。之后，便久久抹不去。

　　《堂吉诃德》主要讲述了一位绅士由于看多了骑士小说，便幻想着成为一位威风凛凛的大骑士。于是，他改名堂吉诃德·拉曼恰，让自己的仆人和邻居做他的侍从，开始了一段令人哭笑不得的旅途。期间，他把羊群看做敌人，把旅店看做城堡，把酒囊看做巨人头，把苦役犯当作受害的骑士。不断的不顾青红皂白的乱杀乱砍。他的行为不仅伤害了他人，自己也受苦，正可谓：损人不利己。最后，他立下遗嘱，如果唯一的亲人侄女嫁给骑士的话，就取消她的继承权。

　　这本书诙谐幽默，读着不禁令人发笑。但作为世界名著，自然有他深刻蕴含的道理：有一份幻想固然是好的，但如果是不切实际的妄想，最终不仅会伤害别人，还害了自己。堂吉诃德的骑士梦是美好的，但他实现这个梦的过程，却不理想

　　这不禁令我想起了如今，不是还有不少人是这样吗？有的人为了成就自己的成名梦，不惜作践自己，用金钱去开路。有的人为了自己能上一所好的大学，不惜采用作弊的手段。这不是一样令人发笑吗？

　　但是，有些人则恰恰相反。他们勇于为了自己的理想，自己的梦想去拼搏。多少学子寒窗苦读，只为金榜提名；多少热血少年发愤图强，只为在奥运为国争光。这，不正恰恰体现出了那份为梦想的执着吗？

　　堂吉诃德，一本数十万字的堂吉诃德。却时刻在提醒着我们：不要成为下一个堂吉诃德！

　　堂吉诃德读后感10

　　即使被所有的人嘲笑，被所有的人孤立，我们活着，只活这一次，当然是为心活，为我们理想的那个世界活。为什么要和大多数人一样，染上这种通病？堂吉诃德的不被人理解使我想到那个在荒原上绝望呐喊的梵高，被认为患有精神病，没人理解他的想法，悲苦地绝望挣扎，用画撕扯表达所有的强烈。如今，他的画作成为珍藏巨作。梵高为心爱的女人割下自己的左耳，这样的极端与偏执，是属于他自己顺从内心的作为，为什么要被别人评头论足，恶语中伤呢？没有任何人有资格。

　　行进途中多少次，堂吉诃德感到害怕畏缩，他不断鼓励自己勇敢，提醒自己是一个骑士，这才能够促使他不断迈向自己的理想。人的心，即是万物的主宰。你笑，这世界便与你一起笑了；你哭，世界都一片昏暗。

　　人总是要有点精神的，鲁迅如是说。堂吉诃德是一个拥有理想主义的冒险家。初读《堂吉诃德》时，每每看到他那种疯狂的举动我都会觉得不可理喻，但后来深入阅读下去，我渐渐开始敬佩堂吉诃德。人总是要在现实和理想主义中作出选择，堂吉诃德选择了后者，去实现他伟大的骑士梦，去实现他那个被别人嘲笑的梦想，坚定不移。这需要多天真的心情与足够的勇气。也许用世俗的标准判断，堂吉诃德的理想没有实现，失败了。

　　但是用自己的心去衡量，堂吉诃德绝对是人生的真正的骑士，为自己的梦去闯荡这么一回，人生足够完美。